What happens when you do X.....? (using Clean Language)

A young cricketer I have been coaching for some considerable time has had issues with his batting - not so much technical, because I and other coaches have all coached the technical side of his game and he can play every shot in the book when he chooses to.
No, the problem is shot selection......or so it would seem.

How does the coach tutor shot selection in any sport where the ball is moving towards the shot maker? (A semi-closed skill - given that the ball is moving.) Visible clues and cues, of as high a quality as possible and as early as possible, are the bulk of the incoming sensory information. The ability to filter out other external sensory data is hugely important. Also hugely important to eradicate is random and distractive internal dialogue...the only I/D should be positive, instructive and focussed comments, mostly geared to the next set of physical actions required (keep watching the ball, move your feet etc). But at that key moment of shot selection the critical faculty needs to be as clear of irrelevant data as possible in order to make the best choice. QED.

So here is the framework of his actions.....he seems to make 70-80% "good" choices but because of his associated footwork the "good" percentage goes down to below 20%. In matches he gets out easily, almost irresponsibly it seems, because although he knows what he should be doing he seems to be uncareful and uncaring of doing it.

No one who times the ball as well, or can hit the ball as well as he can, deserves to be given up on - but coaches usually want players to at least help themselves somewhat! And thus it transpires that he developed into a coaches' abandoned dilemma because of involuntary and uncontrollable foot movements.

I have been working with CLEAN LANGUAGE over recent weeks and so I tried an approach to the dilemma from the CLEAN angle.

We looked at his foot placements relative to a complete range of shots and relative to the level of committed power to those shots.

PW - "So what happens when you play this shot?"
Plyr - "I play with power"
PW - "And where is power?"
Plyr - "In my hands and arms"
PW - "And what kind of power is that power?"
Plyr - "Very powerful"
PW - "And is there anything else about very powerful?"
Plyr - "I put everything into it"
PW - "And what needs to happen for very powerful?"
Plyr - "I need room to play"
PW - "And when very powerful, what happens to foot placement?"
Plyr - "It gets out of the way"
PW - "And when less power, what happens to foot placement?"
Plyr - "Its not so out of the way"
PW - "And is there a relationship between power and foot placement?"
Plyr - "I suppose there is. Less power means foot placement is in a better place. More power means foot placement is in a different place"
PW - "And for foot placement to always be in a better place, what needs to happen for power?"
Plyr - "Power needs to be less"
PW - "And can you control foot placement?"
Plyr - "Probably only if I control power"

We left it there as he was anxious to get back playing against proper bowlers. Over the next and subsequent batting sessions we all noticed a marked change in his power:foot placement ratio and the improvement in outcomes. He was clearly integrating his control over the level of power and how it gave him control over foot placement.

NLP in coaching works extremely well especially in dealing with barriers that are difficult to break down. Using Clean Language effectively opens up even more doors that are "locked" or just stuck.
To find out more about Clean Language go to

www.cleanchange.co.uk

Left Brain / Right Brain? Which way to go?

I'm working with a young right handed cricketer at the moment, who was quite uncomfortable when holding the bat. I asked him to try batting left-handed and suddenly he looked and felt much more natural.

There are two current members of the England team (Jimmy Anderson and Stuart Broad) who bat left-handed and bowl right handed so this is nothing new. The exciting part for me is that I was involved with his 'discovery'.

More details of the project are here:-

http://prodigycoachcoachesforum.myfastforum.org/_quot_And_how_does_that_feel_quot_Right_hander_into_Lef_about54.html

PW

The 4 Cartesian Questions (NLP) - pre-match team talk

I've been examining the 4 Cartesian Questions in the sporting context and indeed illustrated them in a pre-match talk for the rugby team I coach, a couple of weeks ago.

For a side of average age around 21-22 with few 'old heads' in there, the problem has been consistency in terms of performance. The 'old heads' bring with them a level of experience that gives them a higher level of emotional intelligence, and in this side it is noticeable that the 2 lads at college (the youngest) are the ones with the lowest EI score. So the quandry was to find a means of guiding the whole team into an area where they could understand their own decision making in the course of a game and how it impacts upon the rest of the players, elements of the playing process, and inevitably the outcome of the match.

I started the talk mentioning the Butterfly Effect https://g.co/kgs/UgA6bW which pre-framed my point of invitation for the players' thoughts. So (eg) does the flap of a butterfly's wings in Sao Paolo set off series of events to alter the path of a hurricane in the Caribbean?
As thoughts on this were rattling around inside for them I sprung the 4 Cartesian Questions ... and decided to frame them in rugby terms :-

1. What will happen if you DO make that tackle?

2. What will happen if you DON'T make that tackle?

3. What won't happen if you DO make that tackle?

4. What won't happen if you DON'T make that tackle?

So how effective was this?

In terms of performance things went really well, through warm up and overall through the game. There were some momentary slips (as always) but the general level of decision making through the team was much much better. I have not yet asked the players how they felt about the pre-talk (if anything) because most of my talks are aimed at a point just on the rim of conscious awareness, and are metaphorical and non-motivational. We lost by 1 point to a side who had beaten us convincingly earlier in the season, so in outcome terms there was a huge improvement. We should have won to be fair, but missed 2 kickable penalties in the second half to re-take the lead.

These 4 Cartesian Questions do set up interesting trains of thought for inexperienced players, and it certainly de-focusses their feelings of singularity which is so destructive in a 15-man team game. The belief that they and only they can change the course of the game by (in effect) trying to do too much every time they have the ball in hand. So they only have to consider beating their wings to make changes ........

Fascinating concepts - great questions!

How is Your Pain (xxxx) today?

What a lovely way to pre-frame your therapy/treatment sessions!

Without resisting the opportunity for even more sarcasm, this was the chat I had with my pilates teacher/injury rehab facilitator this morning as I had some more critical examination of my faulty knee.
We both agreed that this kind of pre-framing almost trashes any efficacy before treatment has even started...and yet in mainstream healthcare this is a very regular occurrence. This "culture" for want of a better word leads on to the fairly liberal resorting to the chemical solution in far too many cases.

Take dementia/Alzheimer's treatments for instance. Here is a comment from the Alzheimer's Society - http://alzheimers.org.uk/site/scripts/news_article.php?newsID=228 and the BBC Panorama programme referred to is not available to view any more but the following article remains - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/panorama/7104212.stm.

Living with and "minding" my father (who has dementia and is 91) I have noticed how best to manage his condition drug-free that makes it best for him, and easiest to manage. We all 'have our moments' with him of course, but essentially he potters along quite happily with no treatment - except for supplementary vitamin B12 course administered via his local GP. The fact that this has lapsed over the last 9 months due to "failures of the local system" is disappointing because it clearly made a difference for him when it was regular. There's a long way between vitamin B12 and anti-psychotic drugs however!

So - to get back to the pre-framing, very early on as an NLP'er I came to understand that certain words had the most negative effect on rapport and states, and that there are positive alternatives that open up all the possibilities for clearer (and cleaner) channels of communication.

Imagine the conversation with my father using the above question.....
"How is your memory (or dementia even) today?" - reply - "What? Huh? Sorry I don't know what you're talking about."

PW