Currently, the buzzword in sporting circles is resilience. Collectively the England
cricket team need more of it, whilst some of the individuals within the team
have gained a lot more of it, some have got theirs back, and some can’t seem to
find theirs right now. Andy Murray now seems to have got more of it, whilst Novak
Djokovic, Serena Williams and now Stan Wawrinka appear to have cornered the world market in the
commodity. Everywhere we turn, we hear it mentioned.
Because we give it a label, like confidence and charisma, it
is immediately more tangible. It is – like a commodity – valuable, tradable,
marketable. I bet there are, as I write, people in the great wide coaching
world away from sport already billing themselves as Resilience Coaches.
Resilience in performance is described as the ability to
remain composed, confident and consistent in the face of errors. A resilient
player is one who can let go of errors and return to the present moment.
Back in 2004, courtesy of the Saturday morning SkyTV show
SoccerAM, the word bouncebackability was coined and it became a bit of a cult word with sports fans, pundits and
players. It took a rather sterile phrase from sports psychology - mental resilience in sport - breathed life
into it, injected it with pzazz, and
gave this six-syllable, concatenated construction a street cred that almost raised
it to being inducted into the linguistic hall of fame called The English
Dictionary.
These days, many things to do with the mental side of sport
are much more widely mentioned and discussed in the media. Gone is the mystery and
we regularly encounter commentators, pundits and players extolling the benefits
and virtues of athletes being grounded, of having clarity, of being resilient.,
of being in a Flow State or in The Zone.
However, as we travel down the players’ spectrum from elite
to grass roots we still encounter a lot of the stigma associated with anything
tagged with the words mental or psychology. There is still
an old-school type of unease and distrust attached to anything referred to as
being in the mind rather than in the
body.
And it probably goes to the deep-seated fear in our society of being dubbed as a bit of a head case, slightly weird, unhinged, not quite all there, not entirely in control, dysfunctional, having a problem, of being unable to cope, of being ill in the mind, of being – for all intents and purposes – BROKEN.
Our culture, built as it is upon the perfect ideal, can just about put up with broken bodies – but broken minds? Perish the thought. Yet, statistically, we are told that 1 in 4 people in the UK will experience a mental health problem each year.
And it probably goes to the deep-seated fear in our society of being dubbed as a bit of a head case, slightly weird, unhinged, not quite all there, not entirely in control, dysfunctional, having a problem, of being unable to cope, of being ill in the mind, of being – for all intents and purposes – BROKEN.
Our culture, built as it is upon the perfect ideal, can just about put up with broken bodies – but broken minds? Perish the thought. Yet, statistically, we are told that 1 in 4 people in the UK will experience a mental health problem each year.
Bouncing Back
So how can we get to be resilient in our sport – or indeed
in our lives?
Can we learn bouncebackability?
Can we learn bouncebackability?
The simple answer, of
course, is yes.
Why do I say of course? Well, everything starts somewhere
and we are not born with an innate understanding of making mistakes and getting
over them. We first gain an understanding about making errors and mistakes, of
getting things wrong, from our familial culture. Later, as we first go to
school, we discover more about errors, corrections and how society and the
others around us judge the making of mistakes.
This early influence lays a very crucial foundation for our
ability to be resilient. And when we are growing up and constantly learning
things, this ability is with us every waking moment, and pervades every single
thing we do. This underlines my belief that everything, every action, in our
lives is a unique performance, and is borne out by this famous quote by Heraclitus
of Ephesus:
“No man ever steps into the same river twice, for it’s not the same river and he is not the same man.”
“No man ever steps into the same river twice, for it’s not the same river and he is not the same man.”
You could say that we are all of us at the mercy of our early
influences, so much so that by the time we are seven we have already been put
on the road to becoming either a very resilient performer, a confidence player
or a perfectionist, or somewhere in between!
However, although this might presuppose that we cannot get
off that ROAD once we have been put on it, we are subject to influence and
persuasion all the time. And it is the influences we encounter at any time that
can steer us elsewhere and to enable us to perform in a different way, and
perhaps a more successful or a more fulfilling way.
Gaining a Foothold on
Resilience
Once we know there is another ROAD, that we are not doomed
or BROKEN, and that there is such a thing called resilience, we can start to discover more about how we can make our
performances more consistent and rewarding, and fuse our love of our sport with
the joy and ecstasy of doing it to the very best of our abilities, in the
moment.
Gloria Solomon and
Andrea Becker (2004) came up with an
interesting acronym that described a four step process they developed to help
athletes deal with performance errors.
A = Acknowledge the error and the frustration it has caused
R = Review the play and determine how and why the error occurred
S = Strategise a plan to make the necessary corrections for the future
E = Execute and prepare for the next play
A = Acknowledge the error and the frustration it has caused
R = Review the play and determine how and why the error occurred
S = Strategise a plan to make the necessary corrections for the future
E = Execute and prepare for the next play
Amusingly, they described this as “teaching athletes this sequence will give them a tool for managing the
emotional response which comes with making mistakes, and help them to get their
ARSE in gear!”
Arseing about
I am coaching an 8 year old at the moment who is very keen on his cricket. I noticed early on that if he perceived some part of our practice as being a performance, a contest, then his behaviour changed.
I am coaching an 8 year old at the moment who is very keen on his cricket. I noticed early on that if he perceived some part of our practice as being a performance, a contest, then his behaviour changed.
He would hit the ball, make a slight error, fall to the ground whilst saying in
a miserable tone of voice how he’d got it wrong, messed it up, and seemed
inconsolably upset with himself. He appeared to become a near perfectionist and
probably had about 5% resilience.
Without realising it, I ran the ARSE strategy and got him back on his feet and ready to play the next ball. I got him to hit 10 balls at a target in this little contest, and after every error he ran his sequence and I ran the ARSE strategy.
Without realising it, I ran the ARSE strategy and got him back on his feet and ready to play the next ball. I got him to hit 10 balls at a target in this little contest, and after every error he ran his sequence and I ran the ARSE strategy.
Now the interesting thing here was that not only was he learning how to be more
resilient, but he was also learning about MY coaching culture, and my approach
to helping people get over errors and to getting better. By the time we’d moved
on to practicing another cricket skill, he’d grasped the whole idea of how we
get better at something by making mistakes and getting it wrong.
Work in Progress
I’ve worked with enough perfectionists and confidence
players over the years to know that it is definitely a player’s thinking that
gets them into a place of low resilience, and that it is definitely their
thinking that is getting in the way of their performance.
The Secret – or this particular
version of it – is to liberate them from the NEED to Listen to their own Thinking.
We all have a tendency to hang onto the familiar, and the more familiar we are
with Listening to our own Thinking then the more we will hang on to the NEED to
do it.
I first used the phrase Work in Progress some years back
with a lad who was inhibited by perfectionism even in practice, let alone in
performance. We would be working on some particular skill and his behaviour
would change as a result of his (in his eyes) making a mistake – getting it
wrong. In a way he resembled my recent 8 year old in that he struggled with the
emotional outpouring initiated by his Inner
Judge.
“Look,” I said to him, “this is just practice. And everything you do in practice is just Work in Progress. Your work has progressed from there to here, and next we will be progressing your work from here to the next place. It is how we grow our skills.”
And I watched him listening and nodding, and somewhere inside he made the connection and got his ARSE in gear!
“Look,” I said to him, “this is just practice. And everything you do in practice is just Work in Progress. Your work has progressed from there to here, and next we will be progressing your work from here to the next place. It is how we grow our skills.”
And I watched him listening and nodding, and somewhere inside he made the connection and got his ARSE in gear!
Almost at once he stopped beating himself
up in practice. Before the next match he was due to play, I talked with him
about how we can take our Work in Progress into a contest. He
made mistakes – and he dealt with them well. From that moment on he became a
resilient player, and he understood resilience even though we never talked
about it.
Making deliberate
mistakes in practice
The rugby team I coach did a double take the first time I
asked them to run a simple passing drill – deliberately passing badly. Why on
earth would anyone want to practice getting something wrong?
I unpacked for them some of the reasons why this might be a useful
strategy in practice, although I also kept some of the reasons up my sleeve as
well.
The obvious one is that it is designed to sharpen up the mental and physical
reactions and skills of the receiver of the pass – and since this was a drill
involving everyone both passing and receiving, then the passer gets a much
better sense of the pressure he puts his team mates under when he makes a
mistake, when he gets it wrong.
When the players first started running the drill, they all
found it difficult to deliberately pass badly. This brought – via a felt sense
- an immediate understanding that mistakes are not anyone’s fault, but rather
that they just happen and there should be no blame attached. The players all
got a much better idea of how good their skills and competences really were.
The comedian Les Dawson had a wonderful way of playing the
piano badly out of key. The thing was – in order to play that badly and
to make it so funny, he actually had to be able to play the piano really
well.
Another interesting payback from the Deliberate Bad Pass drill comes in terms of players encountering resilience
practice.
A = Acknowledge the error and the frustration it has caused
R = Review the play and determine how and why the error occurred
S = Strategise a plan to make the necessary corrections for the future
E = Execute and prepare for the next play
A = Acknowledge the error and the frustration it has caused
R = Review the play and determine how and why the error occurred
S = Strategise a plan to make the necessary corrections for the future
E = Execute and prepare for the next play
Outcomes:
For passers, the entire error/frustration dynamic was changed.
Players knew why the pass errors occurred and now the review of the play, the drill, was about the receivers’ skills.
If the receivers dropped or failed to gather the bad pass then acknowledging the error was easy and there was no frustration.
On the play review it became clear that the receivers dropped the ball when they didn’t watch it for long enough – in spite of how bad the pass was. The corrective plan was to watch the ball for longer.
They went out and ran the drill again several times, caught most of the passes and marvelled at their ability to be able to pass really badly, deliberately.
For passers, the entire error/frustration dynamic was changed.
Players knew why the pass errors occurred and now the review of the play, the drill, was about the receivers’ skills.
If the receivers dropped or failed to gather the bad pass then acknowledging the error was easy and there was no frustration.
On the play review it became clear that the receivers dropped the ball when they didn’t watch it for long enough – in spite of how bad the pass was. The corrective plan was to watch the ball for longer.
They went out and ran the drill again several times, caught most of the passes and marvelled at their ability to be able to pass really badly, deliberately.
Conclusion
As a Performance Coach who also works as a technical coach, I
consider myself lucky to be in a unique position to be able to embed and
interweave one discipline within another. As a result I’m able to raise the resilience
of grass roots players without having to tell them that we are going to work on
some mental skills. Likewise I’m able to influence an eight year old in terms
of resilience, knowing that that growing understanding will help him in other
parts of his young life.
I was having a casual chat recently with some sporting folk
and someone said, “Everyone talks about resilience now. Is
that like bouncebackability?” I nodded. “Wish
I had it.” He continued, “Wish I
could get some of that. Of course it’s only for professionals and those at the
very top of the game.”
“What makes you think that?” I asked, quite curious about his perspective.
“Well it wouldn’t work on me would it? It’s
all to do with what’s going on in here,” he said, tapping the top of his head.
I leaned forward and looked straight at him, “How do you know you haven’t already got some resilience?”
As a footnote, here is a link to an interesting article in Time Magazine from 2005 called “The
Importance of Resilience.”
No comments:
Post a Comment