Traffic Lights
Where I used to live was right by an in-town cross roads controlled by traffic lights. One particular week the electronics system that controlled the traffic and
pedestrian lights was completely out of action. This meant drivers and pedestrians
had to negotiate the four roads at the junction by virtue of their own
perceptions, rather than relying upon the ordered and programmed logic of the
traffic lights.
It was an
interesting study in human adaptability on a number of levels.
The first
noticeable change was in the cautionary approach, where drivers – when faced
with immediate “WHAT IF?” scenarios – were both more watchful of, AND
considerate to, other drivers. This might have been through being concerned to
preserve the safety of self and vehicle, of course – but it was humans being
adaptable all the same.
I had expected a
continuous cacophony of horns and shouting as the cocooned, selfish and
inconsiderate drove with only their own needs in mind – the “get out of the way
and stand clear because I’m important” kind of attitude that we can witness all
the time at active controlled crossings.
Yet it never happened!
People deferred to others and waved people through. It was as though “peace on
earth” had come to visit this little crossroads of humanity.
However, as I
watched other pedestrians and was also one myself, I became aware of another
noticeable change.
In terms of man v car, the pedestrian is never in a position of ascendancy – therefore the window of opportunity for pedestrians to cross at a busy junction can only be brought about by traffic lights. Without vehicles being held on all the four approach roads at once, pedestrians will always attempt to cross at their own risk.
It is a “The Quick and the Dead” situation.
In terms of man v car, the pedestrian is never in a position of ascendancy – therefore the window of opportunity for pedestrians to cross at a busy junction can only be brought about by traffic lights. Without vehicles being held on all the four approach roads at once, pedestrians will always attempt to cross at their own risk.
It is a “The Quick and the Dead” situation.
Thus I joined the
other foot soldiers in using eyes and
ears in an enhanced manner, to gather concurrent information from four
different directions as to whether it was safe to cross. This was much more of a challenge than usual. It
took some additional boldness of step and clarity of mind. The spectre of Fear
stalked my streets!
The Chicken and the Road
It reminded me of
the period in my life, which probably peaked around 25 years ago, when I was
affected particularly badly - by stress. This impacted on me on a
daily basis in a number of ways, one of which was further caution when I
crossed the road.
This extra level of
caution was part of my control strategy for safety and survival in a hostile
environment – and it was triggered into Mind whether I was crossing at a
designated pedestrian place, or at just any point.
I can distinctly remember looking left, then right, then left again, then right
again, over and over. I did this far too many times – and when the road even
looked clear and I had stepped into it, I was still checking, and re-checking.
This was just in case a vehicle came into view and I would have to then take
evasive action and make a run for it.
That, of course, was also a dangerous situation – for what would happen to me if I lost my footing and slipped or tripped over in the road? Well the vehicle would run me over wouldn’t it?
That, of course, was also a dangerous situation – for what would happen to me if I lost my footing and slipped or tripped over in the road? Well the vehicle would run me over wouldn’t it?
Now
whilst one may consider that only a robot vehicle would be the kind to mindlessly wipe me out – the real danger always comes from the ones driven by the people
out there who are just hell bent on mowing me down.
Now I knew that
this was not the behaviour of the usual ME. I knew I was a careful and watchful
pedestrian and there was no need for this repeated and excessive care. Yet here
I was, engulfed in anxious questioning every time I looked left and right. And
the question was, “Yes but WHAT IF something comes round the corner and I’m stranded and
unable to get out of the way?”
A nightmare
scenario – as REAL as every bit of sensual data I was experiencing on those
same streets.
Yet it was only the construct of my over-heated and stressed-out Mind.
Adaptability and Control
Now, while I’m
reminded of those dark stressful days back in my past, those old thoughts and
the behaviour they triggered did not come back to haunt me. The recent challenge
of being extra vigilant was accepted and executed with a clear mind - in the
same way that we might take an umbrella with us if it is raining. It was all
just something to be encountered out there in the formed reality of the urban
thoroughfare.
As a human, this is
an example of my innate adaptability – an admirable yet also learnable quality.
However, as modern
humans we also like to be in control – a less admirable and also learnable way
of being.
Our modern Society
is full of controls and compliance requirements to make it function better. Likewise
our own “inner society” – the thought driven society of our intellect if you
like – also has lots of controls and compliances to make us function “better”.
Or so we think.
And this is part of the problem for our “inner society”. Our intellect wants to run the show. We convince ourselves that our intellect knows best because – after all – I think therefore I am proves this doesn’t it.
Or so we think.
And this is part of the problem for our “inner society”. Our intellect wants to run the show. We convince ourselves that our intellect knows best because – after all – I think therefore I am proves this doesn’t it.
Thought-led Control usually starts with ourselves.
Once we feel we have a handle on our own control we like to be able to control lots of other things as well. We build a relationship with our “world” and we like to be able to control that “world” and everything about it and everything in it.
Sometimes we discover that our Control is under threat, so we marshal personal forces (attitude and behaviour) to fight that threat and to wrest control back from it.
Sometimes we become addicted to Control, seduced by it, and we build and train personal forces (attitude and behaviour again) to satisfy our addiction.
Most of the time,
however, we just feel and follow our need for control in certain parts of our
lives and relinquish the need for control in others.
And we recognise that NEED
only in parts of our lives that really MATTER to us.
Our Command and Control System
As we grow up we
discover and learn about many, many things. It starts with “the world” and how “the
world” works. We experience “the world” as a single entity with us placed at
the centre of it. We find that when A happens, or if we do A then this results
in an outcome B. If B is what we want then we now have control, because we
merely have to do A to get it. We also have control if we don’t want outcome B –
by not doing or avoiding A.
Later we discover
and learn, usually through experience, that “the world” is much bigger than we
first assumed, thought and experienced. We find we are not always at the centre
of “the world” any more – so we need to discover more about Control in order to redress the
situation and wrest some of that back for ourselves.
This is our
adaptability in action.
The road is dotted with
potholes. We adapt our original, unswerving straight line of driving to make
our ride smoother – by steering a pathway that avoids as many of the potholes
as we can. The more we understand the road AND the way we are driving – the more
adaptable we will be; the smoother and more enjoyable our ride will be; the
less damage our vehicle will suffer from the effect of the potholes.
We cannot control the road – we can only
observe, know more about it and understand it.
We can control the way we are driving of course – and for this we need a greater understanding about how control works.
We can control the way we are driving of course – and for this we need a greater understanding about how control works.
Control can be
either thought-driven or impulse-driven.
One is slow and considered and the other is much quicker and intuitive.
One is in the foreground of our cognitive awareness, and the other is much more in the background, in a deeper or more profound place.
We say that one is more at a ‘conscious’ level and the other is more at an ‘unconscious’ level.
We put labels on these levels merely to help us gain an understanding as to how control works.
One is slow and considered and the other is much quicker and intuitive.
One is in the foreground of our cognitive awareness, and the other is much more in the background, in a deeper or more profound place.
We say that one is more at a ‘conscious’ level and the other is more at an ‘unconscious’ level.
We put labels on these levels merely to help us gain an understanding as to how control works.
Yet – here’s the
thing:
If we think and believe that control works best via a thought-driven process, then we will allow that process to take
over ALL the impulse-driven controls as well. It will be like handing over some
of our driving to a driver that is in the back seat of the car. That
driver will have a different perspective of the road, and also be functionally
distant from being able to drive well. By that I mean that back seat drivers
cannot reach the pedals, gear stick and steering wheel very well – and certainly
cannot do all those things smoothly and concurrently whilst studying the road at
the same time. They CAN do all those things from the driver’s seat – but we are
talking about the occasions when the driver’s seat is occupied by the other
driver.
Take my crossing
the road when suffering from stress. I believed I needed to be controlled by a thought-driven process when performing
the dangerous act of crossing the road. So I gathered data in a slow and
considered way – a way SO slow, that I had to keep looking left and right to
keep gathering new data, because in the SLOW process the data soon passed its “use
by” date. I would be stupid to rely on stale, out of date data for my safety,
so I kept demanding new and fresh data.
To a casual observer I would appear to be dithering, but what was really
happening was my command and control centre was repeatedly saying to my eyes
and ears, “Give me fresh information!” I had lost my ability to adapt through
my believing that for this PARTICULAR part of my life I needed to think my way
through the process.
Similarly, if the
drivers at my crossroads without lights had all been stressed-out then there
would have been traffic chaos, gridlock. Instead, they were all adaptable –
they enabled their ability to adapt to the circumstances. The pedestrians did
too – otherwise there would have been hundreds of them stood there waiting, too
scared to move.
Mending the Lights
So consider some of
the issues that might be affecting the traffic in your life.
Take an analytical
perspective on your command and control system to find out about how much is
thought-driven and how much is impulse-driven.
Examine what is happening
to your adapt-ability when some of your traffic lights stop working, or they
get stuck either on “Stop” or “Go”.
Remember this particularly famous quote from Albert Einstein:
No comments:
Post a Comment